About AE | For Advertisers | Contact AE | Subscribe to AE | HOME

 

Newsletter:

Subscribe Now
Current Newsletter
Archive

Resources:

Blog
Webinars
Conferences
Buyer's Guide
Events
Editorial Calendar
Classifieds
Be An Author

Advertisers:

Advertiser Info
Rent Mailing Lists
Rent E-mail Lists
Digital Ads

Related Sites:

RF Design
PET
Electronic Design
EEPN
Microwaves & RF
Planet EE



Basic analysis and evaluation of low-dropout regulators

Sep 1, 2007 12:00 PM
by John Pyle, Paul Emerald, and Denis Galipeau


A spectrum of silicon technologies has evolved, each with its own inherent set of properties. Strengths, shortcomings, and trade offs are apparent with each analysis. And, designers must choose the optimal approach to meet their system objectives.

Click here for the enhanced PDF version of this article

An expanding array and breadth of low dropout (LDO) linear regulator architectures have evolved, and each with its own inherent set of properties. Strengths are traded off against shortcomings, and each designer should (prudently) select the optimal solution to match system objectives. These architectures are well established and reliable, but differ widely in maturity, relative performance, and cost. Reviewing and evaluating available options can be a daunting endeavor when deciding upon the most apt solution for any specific system.

AUTOMOTIVE LDOS

PNP-based architectures, for instance, are mature, and typically low cost, as large feature-size bipolar processes are the norm. This implementation affords very low dropout, but does forfeit performance linked to gain, output current capacity, and output capacitance/ESR essential to proper stability. Presently, it is primarily used in lower-current (<1 A) LDOs, and the ratio of PNP usage diminishes as MOS processes expand in acceptance.

Read the full PDF of this article



November 2007






 
Back to Top


Contact Us  For Advertisers  For Search Partners  Privacy Policy  Subscribe  RSS
© 2007 Penton Media, Inc. All rights reserved.